VIA Nano ultra-low power processor
Atom smasher?
14th August 2008 11:51 GMT
We completely agree, and have to consider the system as a whole both for Atom and Nano. The Overall score in PCMark05 for Atom is 1683, compared to the Nano's 1538. That’s a small win for Intel because the graphics and memory scores on the Nano platform are truly dire. We have to hope that VIA will update its CN896 North Bridge and Chrome9 HC IGP graphics as they are letting Nano down.
PCMark05 Results
Longer bars are better
3DMark06 Results
Note, no ShaderModel 3.0 scores
Longer bars are better
Print story
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 Dual Core Processor (3GHz, 6MB, 1333MHz FSB, LGA775 Socket T)
Intel Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor (2.66GHz, 4x256kB, 4.8GT/s QPI, LGA 1336 Socket B)
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Dual Core Processor (3.1GHz, 2MB, 1000MHz FSB, Socket AM2)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor (2.40GHz, 4x2MB, 1066MHz FSB, Socket T)
AMD Phenom X4 9950 Quad-Core Processor (2.6GHz, 2MB, 2000MHz FSB, Socket AM2+)
