By Andraž LevstikPosted Friday 5th September 2008 12:10 GMT
where's the 3G option...
Spec?
By DavePosted Friday 5th September 2008 15:54 GMT
Was it just me, or was there nothing technical in this review at all?
Re: Spec?
By David GosnellPosted Friday 5th September 2008 17:06 GMT
The average Pure customer doesn't give a toss, so long as it looks retro-crap and has PURE emblazoned on the front - boxes this ticks just nicely.
And I say that as a happy Pure hi-fi customer, the DMX series being actually rather good and unlike anything else they make.
So ...
By Simon WardPosted Friday 5th September 2008 17:34 GMT
It's obviously better than the Roberts WM202, which I quite fancied until I read a few review of it, but there are some glaring omissions in this review:
- Is it purely WiFi, or does it have an Ethernet port like the WM202?
- Does the unit have RCA out, so I can hook it up to my hi-fi amp?
- Is it necessary to use the 'Lounge' portal to set up my
preferences or can I dial them in using the front panel or a.n.
other way?
- How easy is it to set up on an encrypted (WEP/WPA) wireless network?
A related question would be: why is it so fecking expensive?
Doesn't look like I'll be retiring the old Netgear MP101 just yet, obviously.
)))Stereo(((
By rick buckPosted Friday 5th September 2008 20:35 GMT
If it is not at least a stereo in the package with out hooking it up to something else...it is not going to replace the boombox (which IS Stereo), IMO it is nothing but a MONOPHONIC TRANSISTOR RADIO.
dab plus?
By paul foxPosted Friday 5th September 2008 23:00 GMT
Is it dab plus or plus upgradeable
Unanswered question
By Robert E A HarveyPosted Saturday 6th September 2008 07:13 GMT
The review leaves a big question unanswered.
Will it only play mp* style streams, or will it do real audio too?
If you can't use it for BBC 'listen again' it isn't an internet radio!
Specs are here...
By Jamie WalkerPosted Saturday 6th September 2008 07:52 GMT
Using the internet, I clicked on the link to the website and then the Specs tag and OMG YSRLY I found the specs. I think they were left out of the interview because, erm, it was easy to find 'em?
Looks like it answers most of the questions above
- it's DAB now, upgradeable to DAB+ later
- no ethernet, totally wireless (boo!)
- no RCA connectors (just headphone\stereo out\additional speaker out)
- can set up 30 'presets' on the faceplate (30 DAB, FM, Unlimited internet favourites limited to 10 until you use lounge) I'm guessing that it comes with access to things like a 'main directory' but the Lounge is the *real* way to set things up. Not too sure about this, but hey, it's an 'always on wireless device' so I guess it'll work...
- It can be set to WEP\WPA\WPA2 - but we'll have to wait until it's launched to see how easy
- Stereo - can buy an extra speaker (rip off!) to make stereo. For 30 quid? Whoops, that's a bit of a crapthing.
- It's so fecking expensive because we're in the UK and it's for geeks with money to burn. And it looks prettier than the Netgear MP101 ;) Although so saying, I'm not retireing my Airtunes\Airfoil plug just yet. But I may well do so after I've seen this in action.
specs
By JethroPosted Saturday 6th September 2008 10:31 GMT
Check the pure site and click specs:
"Future upgrade supported for DAB+.
Wireless: 802.11b and 802.11g supported with WEP and WPA/WPA2 encryption.
No mention of ethernet, though it does list mini USB for product upgrades and you would need a 3.5 to RCA cable for hi-fi.
Re: )))Stereo(((
By druckPosted Monday 8th September 2008 09:09 GMT
Showing my age, but as someone who spent years of frustration waiting for Radio 1 to get their own FM stereo slot (rather than being given a few hours Radio 2s), and having to put up with all the best music being in horrid AM mono, I'd never consider buying any form of radio that wasn't stereo.
Naff
By skelbandPosted Monday 8th September 2008 19:45 GMT
Why is it that so many Digital Radios look so unbelievably naff?
They're new, they're modern for f*ck's sake!
So many of them look like so much cheap old-style reproduction tat.
Give me one that looks like a modern device any day and I might be temped to get one.
MonoPhonic
By rick buckPosted Tuesday 9th September 2008 03:53 GMT
I'm with the last poster...
It Is a New Device, Whats with making it look like a 40's or 50's radio?
And at that price it better be at least stereo, by itself.
Modern streams are at least stereo, and a surround chip is a couple of dollars each. I can understand the uni-bars for tvs,
that have left, center, and right all in one. But,
A Monophonic Radio (of any quality or source),
will never be on my list of purchases.
Probably sell a crap-load to the "Bose" crowd,
or those that wonder...
"why a sound system HAS to have ALL those speakers?
Comments on: Pure Digital Evoke Flow internet radio
Hmmm
By Andraž Levstik Posted Friday 5th September 2008 12:10 GMT
Spec?
By Dave Posted Friday 5th September 2008 15:54 GMT
Re: Spec?
By David Gosnell Posted Friday 5th September 2008 17:06 GMT
So ...
By Simon Ward Posted Friday 5th September 2008 17:34 GMT
)))Stereo(((
By rick buck Posted Friday 5th September 2008 20:35 GMT
dab plus?
By paul fox Posted Friday 5th September 2008 23:00 GMT
Unanswered question
By Robert E A Harvey Posted Saturday 6th September 2008 07:13 GMT
Specs are here...
By Jamie Walker Posted Saturday 6th September 2008 07:52 GMT
specs
By Jethro Posted Saturday 6th September 2008 10:31 GMT
Re: )))Stereo(((
By druck Posted Monday 8th September 2008 09:09 GMT
Naff
By skelband Posted Monday 8th September 2008 19:45 GMT
MonoPhonic
By rick buck Posted Tuesday 9th September 2008 03:53 GMT